Company Benefits Solutions Testimonials +60 3 2147 8634 Get in Touch
Client testimonials for Cendana Counsel

What Organizations Say After Working With Us

These are accounts from Malaysian professional services organizations that have been through one of our advisory engagements. We have not edited the substance of what was said.

← Back to Home

Engagements, Recalled

KH

Khairul Hazwan

Managing Partner, Legal Practice β€” Kuala Lumpur

We had been thinking about our partnership structure for some time but could not find a way to have the conversation that needed to happen. The engagement gave us a structured process for doing that β€” and the written report was something we could actually hand to each partner and discuss. It helped.

March 2025 Β· Professional Services Firm Advisory

RC

Rachel Chong

Director, Accounting Firm β€” Petaling Jaya

The advisor network work was useful because it made us think carefully about which of our advisory relationships were actually working and why. We had accumulated a number of advisors over time without asking whether the arrangement still made sense. The recommendations were practical and we acted on most of them.

February 2025 Β· Trusted Advisor Network Consultation

AZ

Azlan Zainudin

Principal, Consulting Firm β€” Kuala Lumpur

I appreciated that the fee was fixed and the scope was clear before we started. Other consultancies we had approached were reluctant to commit to a price upfront. The client relationship framework we received was well-considered and gave us a shared language within the team for talking about how we manage our client connections.

January 2025 Β· Long-Term Client Relationship Strategy

NM

Norliza Mahmud

Senior Partner, Chartered Accountants β€” Shah Alam

What I noticed first was that the conversations felt genuinely curious rather than confirmatory. The adviser was not trying to validate a pre-formed view β€” she asked questions I had not been asked before. The engagement took longer than I expected to feel comfortable with, but looking back that was appropriate for what the work involved.

March 2025 Β· Professional Services Firm Advisory

TW

Thomas Wong

CEO, Management Consulting β€” Bangsar

We engaged Cendana Counsel for the advisor network work. The process of mapping our advisory relationships and examining which ones were actively useful was something we had avoided because we were not sure how to do it sensitively. The engagement gave us a framework for making changes without damaging relationships unnecessarily.

April 2025 Β· Trusted Advisor Network Consultation

SI

Siti Hajar Ibrahim

Founding Partner, Legal Chambers β€” KLCC

The client relationship framework we received after the engagement has been used in two partner meetings since. It helped us agree on how we describe our approach to long-standing clients β€” something that had been inconsistent across the firm. It was a modest investment for work that has had continued use.

February 2025 Β· Long-Term Client Relationship Strategy

Case Studies

A closer look at how three engagements unfolded and what came out of them. Client names and identifying details have been generalized.

A Legal Practice Examining Its Partnership Arrangements

The Situation

A mid-sized Kuala Lumpur legal practice had grown through the addition of partners over several years. The original structure had not kept pace with that growth and was creating friction that partners felt but had not formally discussed.

What We Did

Over eleven weeks, we met with each partner individually, reviewed existing documentation on the partnership structure, and examined how the firm's operational practices had evolved. We prepared a written report setting out what we observed and a set of considered options for the partners to examine.

What Followed

The partnership held a series of structured conversations using the report as a reference point. Several of the structural issues the report identified were addressed within six months of the engagement concluding. The partners told us the report helped them talk about things that had previously felt difficult to raise.

An Accounting Firm Reviewing Its Advisor Network

The Situation

A Petaling Jaya accounting firm had accumulated a network of professional advisors β€” legal, HR, technology, and financial β€” over fifteen years. The firm's leadership was uncertain which of these relationships were still genuinely useful and how to think about that without causing offence.

What We Did

We mapped the firm's advisory relationships, examined how each was used in practice, and held conversations with the senior people within the firm who interacted with advisors regularly. Our recommendations distinguished between relationships to maintain as they were, relationships worth adjusting, and relationships that had run their natural course.

What Followed

The firm made decisions about three of its advisory relationships within four months β€” two were restructured and one was concluded. The management team said the engagement gave them a way to approach those conversations that felt professional rather than awkward.

A Consulting Firm Developing Its Client Relationship Approach

The Situation

A small Kuala Lumpur consulting firm had ten clients it considered long-term relationships. The founding director was concerned that without a shared understanding of what that meant, the quality of those relationships would vary depending on which consultant was the day-to-day contact.

What We Did

Over seven weeks, we reviewed the firm's current client engagement practices and examined how communication, service delivery, and relationship maintenance differed across the client base. We produced a framework document describing a consistent approach the firm could adopt and train to.

What Followed

The framework was introduced at a team meeting and has since been used to onboard two new consultants. The director told us the document gave the firm something it could refer to when questions arose about how to handle particular client situations β€” reducing inconsistency without being prescriptive.

At a Glance

4.8

Average client satisfaction rating out of 5

80+

Completed advisory engagements in Malaysia

11+

Years of practice in Malaysian professional services

68%

Of clients have returned for a second engagement

Speak with Us Directly

If reading these accounts has prompted questions, we are happy to have a conversation about your organization's situation.

+60 3 2147 8634 [email protected] Mon–Fri, 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Send an Enquiry

Ready to Begin?

Every engagement starts with a conversation. No commitment, no pressure β€” just an honest exchange about whether our work would be useful to your organization at this point in time.

Get in Touch